4 February 2020

Facing the Mystery; or Catholic Crustaceans

The sort of liturgical culture which Catholics have experienced since the 1960s is in fact a culture which was common in English Protestant Non-Conformity for many generations before the 1960s; and in a Protestant ethos it represents the theologically right and appropriate liturgical expectation. If the faith-feeling, fiducia, is the salvific reality to which the Christian must cling, then worship can have no other purpose than to produce and sustain it. It is not for nothing that Protestant ideologues have seen the Sacraments - on the rare occasions when they celebrate them - as merely 'enacted Words'. The problem for us is that for half a century most Catholics have been indoctrinated into that same essentially Protestant presupposition. When, now, they are exposed to something as ancient and authentic as versus Orientem, they can feel excluded by the celebrant - "Why isn't he attending to me?": the reaction of the toddler whose mother seems now to be devoting to the new baby all the love and attention upon which previously that toddler had an exclusive claim. "Leave your horrid private God alone and turn round and be my friend again". These poor layfolk are bound to feel repulsed; the outrage done to their gut-instincts may even make them revolted.

Those of my readers who do not know their Dix off by heart may be amused - as well as instructed - by his well-known account of his Methodist grandmother.
It is an uncanny fact that there is still scarcely any subject on which the imagination of those outside the faith is more apt to surrender to the unrestrained nonsense of panic than that of what happens at the catholic eucharist. As a trivial instance, I remember that my own grandmorther, a devout Wesleyan, believed to her dying day that at the Roman Catholic mass the priest let a crab loose upon the altar, which it was his mysterious duty to prevent from crawling sideways into the view of the congregation. (Hence the gestures of the celebrant.) How she became possessed of this notion, or what she supposed eventually happened to the crustacean, I never discovered. But she affirmed with the utmost sincerity that she had once with her own eyes actually watched this horrible rite in progress; and there could be no doubt of the deplorable effect that solitary visit to a Roman Catholic church had had on her estmate of Roman Catholics in general, though she was the soul of charity in all things else. To all suggestions that the mass might be intended as some sort of holy communion service she replied only with the wise and gentle pity of the fully informed for the ignorant.


Liam Ronan said...

My dear departed mother, whose anniversary is the 9th of February (if you would please pray for her), was fond of telling we her children that when she was a girl she could not fathom why anyone would doubt the Catholic Faith. You see, when the priest elevated the Host at Holy Mass during the consecration, my mother as a child believed that that single Host miraculously multiplied into the many which were later distributed to the Faithful when they communicated. She was right of course; and she had childlike eyes of Faith which never dimmed.

newguy40 said...

"...she was the soul of charity in all things else...."

hahaha. Good one!

Banshee said...

Okay,that one is new. Crabs. Heh.

PseudonymousposterJohn said...

"..which Catholics have experienced since the 1960s is in fact a culture which was common in English Protestant Non-Conformity for many generations before the 1960s.."

Oh yes, Fr.! And that is the OTHER great factor undermining the Church.

I forget when I came to the full enormity of this conclusion, but essentially, in 1945 the headquarters of the Christian Church came face to face with occupation by a bigger, stronger, richer Anglophone occupation that claimed a different version of Christian culture. For some reason, the curia decided it would be best to sell out to the occupiers. So the two thousand years old culture of the Christian Church was junked for the mainstream liberal protestantism as it had developed by the mid twentieth century, just before it disappeared.

Fr John Hunwicke said...

I'm afraid my schoolmaster's correcting pencil comes out when I see things like " ... was fond of telling we ..."

"we" is the object of "telling", so it goes into the oblique or accusative case; "us".

" ...was fond of telling us ..." is the correct English.

PM said...

When I was (very) young and before I started learning Latin,* 'laetificat' would conjure up images of cars lapping up their milk.

* Not until the start of secondary school. No doubt Englishmen of the old school would disapprove.

stephen cooper said...

"She was the soul of charity in all things else" .... probably not, viciously lying about others is a huge sin, and people who indulge in huge sins typically are also indulging in other sins, and people who indulge in sin are not, by definition, "the soul of charity in all things", even if the phrase "the soul of charity" is qualified by the weasel words "in all things else". This obsequious praise of grandmas simply because they are grandmas has to stop somewhere.