A few days ago, the Congregation for Divine Worship published Latin Propers for S Faustina, who is now an optional memorial in the "Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite", for use by anybody in the world who still uses that sweet archaic liturgy, picturequely encrusted as it is with the venerable cobwebs of the 1960s.
My first reaction was to wonder if interdicasterial warfare has broken out. At this moment, an Office in the CDF is preparing propers for the 'newer' Saints to be used in the NNR ('New Normal Rite'; what we called, pre-pandemic, 'the Extraordinary Form'). "CDW is determined to snow them under with even more work", I thought. But then I noticed something very strange about these new propers. 'Uncanny' is not too strong a term. You may shiver as you read the next bit.
I can't see any mistakes in the new texts.
For decades, since, I think, the 1980s, I have been eagerly enjoying new propers issuing from Rome ... they are great fun, because, sooner or later, you find the multiple mistakes in them. This has become a venerable and much-loved Tradition. Sometimes there are elementary III Form howlers in basic Latin Grammar. Sometimes there are mere typos. Often, both. Each time I noticed one, it was like meeting an old friend in one of those old places called "restaurants" in which we used to be convivial together before the Pandemic struck and the CBCEW ordered that all the restaurants should be closed and locked up (or am I getting a bit confused here?).
As well as being a break with Tradition, these new propers for S Faustina seem to me nothing less than a disloyal attack on PF himself. Correct grammar and accurate texts are ... I must be blunt about this ... Rigid. They are also Pharisaical. Could anybody deny that they are Neo-Pelagian? If Austin Ivereigh fails to go public on this, I shall think very much the worse of him.
PF's policy has, from the start, been clear. He wants people to "Make a Mess" (hagan lio). He himself has bravely and paradigmatically led the way by endlessly creating his own top-quality Messes. But what quality of Messes shall we now have in the Catholic Church if Mgr Grotti (who, I can reveal, has long been responsible for inserting the errors into new liturgical texts) has been head-hunted by the Grauniad Newspaper?
Frankly (is that an appropriate adverb to use during this pontificate?), all the dicasteries should, as we English say, "Do Their Bit" (I'm sure bishop Roche will be able to explain that concept to his boss).
CDW is Letting the Side Down (I'm sure etc.etc..)
They must Play the Game and Keep a Straight Bat (I'm etc. etc..)
3 June 2020
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
You are not getting confused, Father. After all, the Fathers often interpreted the inn to which the Good Samaritan took the man lying by the wayside as a figure of the Church.
The texts themselves may be sadly free of amusing howlers, but, luckily, the additions' traditional heading 'IN CALENDARIUM ROMANUM GENERALEM' still persists.
This reminds me of the story of an organist who was approached by his Parish Priest about making the music more accessible. The essence of his argument was that the technical virtuosity and expertise of his playing somehow created a "barrier" to people's engaging with the liturgy. (usual b******s!) The organist then joked: "Well, I suppose I could throw in a few wrong notes or play the wrong tune now and then". The Priest thought this a wonderful idea and encouraged this approach. The organist resigned.
Haec theoria non tenet aquam.
Post a Comment