We have been having some diverting debates in the Lower House of our Legislature; a couple of days ago, the Opposition moved the grand old motion That This House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government. A rather bumptious young government backbencher, mindful that the best mode of defence is attack, was in the course of an onslaught upon the Right Honourable Gentleman the Member for Islington. He was interrupted on a Point of Order by an Opposition Member, who asked Mr Speaker for a ruling on whether the abusive term "Pillock" was Parliamentary.
Mr Speaker explained that what the bumptious youth had, in the heat of his intemperate rhetoric, actually accused the Leader of Her Majesty's Opposition of being was not "a pillock" but "a palaeoMarxist".
Erskine May, apparently, expresses no views on the propriety of this latter term.
[Is it true that 'Pilosi' is a North American variant of 'Pillock'?]
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
Fr John Hunwicke
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
Archive
-
▼
2019
(366)
-
▼
January
(31)
- "Annibale Bugnini Reformer of the Liturgy" (1)
- Fromthecardinalsdesk
- Just checking ...
- Mr Rees Mogg
- Unknown Bones
- "Philip"
- Double Vision
- Auberon Waugh ...
- C S Lewis and ... porn ..
- A bit confused
- Fromthecardinalsdesk
- The Tyranny of the Ignorant
- "Where were you when ...?"
- Two cultures?
- From Fraenkel to Finnis
- Episcopal Resignation (2)
- Foundation of the Ordinariates!!
- Episcopal Resignation (1)
- Not very Kosher
- A Novus Ordo moment
- Stigmaticus perfuga
- Fromthecardinalsdesk
- Statistics, damned Statistics
- Der Spiegel ...
- Happy Christmas ...
- Bishop Graham Leonard
- My dear Wormwood
- Are they really bishops? (3)
- Are they really bishops? (2)
- Pope Murdered. Poirot's Last Case.
- The Circumcision and Mrs Cranmer
-
▼
January
(31)
Popular Posts
-
More Update: Perhaps I should have been more explicit about the complete wrongheadedness of the sort of speculations which could be triggere...
-
There are wild rumours on the Internet about News due to break tomorrow, Sunday. They are, as far as I know, all wrong. Far too wild. Far to...
-
To refresh your memories, I reprint a piece I wrote when an earlier electronic edition of the Dictator Pope was published under a pseudonym:...
-
So a correspondent wrote on one of my threads. It set me thinking. I am convinced that PF is most certainly not the worst man ever to hav...
-
Perhaps a couple of years ago, in Western Ireland, I had the privilege to be in the company of a very great prelate just after he had offere...
-
"After this Magisterium, after this long journey, we can affirm with certainty and with Magisterial authority that the Liturgical Refor...
-
Lead us not into temptation. It is unlikely that the Greek and Latin words translated by temptation meant the sort of thing we mean by ...
-
Pope Francis breaks his silence! A "In authorising regular use of the older Mass, now referred to as the 'extraordinary form...
-
The heart of the Bergoglianist error is, in my fallible opinion, to be found in such texts as the letter Archbishop Nichols wrote last year ...
Followers
Links
Raffaello's Madonna di Foligno
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
3 comments:
I wanted to send you a comment on the validity of the rites of Vatican II.
There is a way to refute the claims of invalidity of the rites of Vatican II: obtain a copy of the rite of the Copts approved by Leo XIII in the 1890s. This rite is very similar, almost identical, to the 1968 rite. And it was approved by Leo XIII, a Pope considered true by the sedevacantists.
If a copy of the rite were obtained, the statements against the validity of the 1968 rite would be refuted. There must be some official document of Leo XIII or of the Church where the approval is recorded.
The Copts, unlike the Maronites, did not use their rite for the enthronement of patriarchs, I believe.
I have tried to find a copy on the Internet, but I have not succeeded.
God bless you.
"Is it true that 'Pilosi' is a North American variant of 'Pillock'?"
Yes.
At first my answer was going to be the rhetorical "Is the Pope Catholic?" but I'm afraid that phrase doesn't work anymore.
In the document "A VINDICATION OF THE BULL ’APOSTOLICÆ CURÆ’, A LETTER ON ANGLICAN ORDERS BY THE CARDINAL ARCHBISHOP AND BISHOPS OF THE PROVINCE OF WESTMINSTER, IN REPLY TO THE LETTER ADDRESSED TO THEM BY THE ANGLICAN ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY AND YORK", the English bishops analyze in detail the rite of the Copts, and say that it is valid and that it was approved by the Church. They reproduce the rite verbatim, and affirm that the words "ruling spirit (or spirit of rule)" adequately express the grace of the Holy Spirit. This rite is almost identical to the rite of Vatican II.
I believe that this document is a total refutation of the claims against the 1968 rite. You can download it here (see pages 47 and 50):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K5VIDBRCHlHgY312YTZKom-F35S8NJkZ/view?usp=sharing
I believe that you can respond with this to recent allegations against your articles.
If you intend to answer the sedevacantists with this document, please there is no need for you to post this comment.
God bless
Post a Comment