The Breviary readings on December 4 recounted that S Peter Chrysologos preached a very fierce sermon against chaps in masks (personati) who took part in ludi with variis saltationibus on the Kalends of January.
His view was that people who wanted to fool around (iocari) with the Devil were not fit to rejoice with Christ. It reminded me rather of S Damasus' campaign aainst the Lupercalia.
Can anybody supply background to this?
UPDATE: following hints from kind correspondents, whom I thank, I was waiting outside Bodley yesterday morning as the portcullis went up after the midwinter absit doctrina break.
For any who have any interest, I commend the Ninth Oration of the late pagan Greek rhetorician Libanius, a supporter of Julian the Apostate (332-363). Naturally, he defends the existence of this old pagan celebration ... though how old it can really be in the Greek world (it is commonly remarked that postponing something until the Greek Calends is a bit like PF setting up a Committee, since Greek Calends do not exist)? [I read it in the Teubner Edition, Vol 1 Fasc 2 pp 393-398. I don't know whither the Greekless could turn to find a crib. The Loeb volumes of Libanius do not include this Oration.]
More entertaining is a sermon by S Asterius, bishop of Amaseia, circa 350 to circa 410. [Migne Patrologia Graeca XL 216-226. Migne is on the Internet and includes a Latin crib of every text printed. Although in many cases, including this one, the 'translation' is more of a paraphrase.] S Asterius describes the Kalends of January as the relentless Argyrolatria of the 'Christmas Shopping period' in post-Christian Western 'civilisation'; as the often extortionate and menacing 'trick or treat' period around 'Hallow e'en'; and as a more-than-usually unwholesome 'Gay Pride' celebration: all arranged neatly together in harmonious disorder on the same day.
Perhaps that's why Chrysologus had his doubts about it.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
Fr John Hunwicke
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
Archive
-
▼
2018
(364)
-
▼
January
(36)
- Impertinent Converts
- I have just ...
- Terminology
- C S Lewis and Amoris Laetitia and the smoke of Satan
- The Final Solution of the Baby Problem
- LANHERNE
- HMD
- Septuagesima
- Laudate Dominum omnes gentes
- APPEAL FOR HELP
- Twenty five long years (2)
- Twenty five long years (1)
- Speed, flexibility
- Con-men and their tricks. How I was led up the Gar...
- Theses
- ....... men ....... de .....
- Ecumenism and the God of Surprises (2)
- Ecumenism (1)
- What's the time, Mr Wolf?
- Indulgences for Unity Week
- Chair of S Peter in January?
- REMEMBER ...
- President Trump
- VIVAT REX (2)
- VIVAT REX (1)
- Thank you ...
- Rowan Williams on "the Celtic Church"
- Sunday Mass
- Cardinal Mueller on Exclusive ideologists
- The Ordinariates, and How To Save The English Church
- Mutual Enrichment
- The King of Love
- Query UPDATE
- Enemies ...
- LAW
- Circumcision
-
▼
January
(36)
Popular Posts
-
More Update: Perhaps I should have been more explicit about the complete wrongheadedness of the sort of speculations which could be triggere...
-
There are wild rumours on the Internet about News due to break tomorrow, Sunday. They are, as far as I know, all wrong. Far too wild. Far to...
-
To refresh your memories, I reprint a piece I wrote when an earlier electronic edition of the Dictator Pope was published under a pseudonym:...
-
So a correspondent wrote on one of my threads. It set me thinking. I am convinced that PF is most certainly not the worst man ever to hav...
-
Perhaps a couple of years ago, in Western Ireland, I had the privilege to be in the company of a very great prelate just after he had offere...
-
"After this Magisterium, after this long journey, we can affirm with certainty and with Magisterial authority that the Liturgical Refor...
-
Lead us not into temptation. It is unlikely that the Greek and Latin words translated by temptation meant the sort of thing we mean by ...
-
Pope Francis breaks his silence! A "In authorising regular use of the older Mass, now referred to as the 'extraordinary form...
-
The heart of the Bergoglianist error is, in my fallible opinion, to be found in such texts as the letter Archbishop Nichols wrote last year ...
Followers
Links
Raffaello's Madonna di Foligno
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
8 comments:
You might find help in M. Meslin La fête des kalendes de janvier dans l'empire romain (Collection Latomus 115, 1970). Libanius Oration IX defends the festival - despite it being Roman rather than Greek in origin.
Wouldn't Guerangercomment?
Pater: Looks like you are referring to Sermo 155 “De kalendis Januarii quae varia gentium superstitione polluebantur”. A note in the text mentions that “profanorum ludorum consuetudo erat pecudum assumptis formis huc illucque discursare et petulantius se gerere.” Other authors (Augustinus, Prudentius, Ambrosius) wrote against the custom.
Heh! Now I get to mention my friend Roger Pearse again!
Mischa Hooker translated "On the Roman Months" by John the Lydian. The section on the Kalends of January begins at Book 4, 3. Nothing about masks.
Here are the links to his newly revised edition, over at Roger's page.
However, in the month of Gamelion (January), there was a Greek festival called the Lenaia that was dedicated to Dionysus. It was one of the times they used to run plays. So maybe it was something of that nature? (If it was something Middle Eastern and pagan, I don't know where to look.)
Another note, related to this, in the Migne Patrologia Latina mentions the Fourth Council of Toledo which mandated that “prima die Januarii Alleluia non cantetur, et abstinentia a carnibus servetur, ut nihil Christianis cum superstitione Gentilium commune sit.”
Imagine that: abstinence on the 1st of January so that Christians won’t have anything in common with popular superstitions.
I think that Chrysologos was referring to the Feast of Fools.
The best account of the Feast Fools that I have encountered is "Sacred Folly", Max Harris, Cornell University Press, 2011.
The whole subject is quite complicated, especially as Harris argues that a faction (of zealots?) in the Middle Ages, being determined to suppress it, waged what we might now call a propaganda war against it, using all sorts of dubious methods in their attacks. He further argues that many 19th and 20th historians have mistakenly accepted this propaganda as a true description of liturgical abuses, hence the distorted view many have of the Feast.
There is a further complication as the Boy Bishop Ceremonies are often regarded as being part and parcel of the Feast of Fools, when probably they were quite separate, although usually celebrated, like the Feast of Fools, in the Octave of the Nativity.
If you will forgive the plug...
I have written a detailed study of the Boy Bishop in my book which is the only comprehensive study of the subject.
"The Medieval Boy Bishops", Neil Mackenzie, 2014. ISBN 9781502924230 (2nd edition)
"The Medieval Boy Bishops", Neil Maxkenzie, Matador, 2011. 9781780880082 (1st edition)
Clumsy error!
In my last post I should have written -
"The Medieval Boy Bishops", Neil Mackenzie, Matador, 2011. ISBN 9781780880082 (1st edition)
Ahem.Father, you may well be right that S Damasus tried to suppress the Lupercalia, and the Emperor Gratian banned pagan celebrations in Rome soon after Damasus death. But it did not have full effect, since a century later S Galsius was trying again.
>>:- the senate protested that the Lupercalia was essential to Rome's safety and well-being. This prompted Gelasius' scornful suggestion that "If you assert that this rite has salutary force, celebrate it yourselves in the ancestral fashion; run nude yourselves that you may properly carry out the mockery."
Post a Comment