The English novelist and Catholic convert Evelyn Waugh (he went to school in the college I taught at for three decades and then to my College at Oxford) began the Second World War enthusiastically in favour of a Crusade against the Russian-German Alliance. Now, spendidly, everything had become clear. The enemy at last was plain in view, huge and hateful, all disguise cast off. It was the Modern Age in arms.
When this conflict turned into a war in which Britain was in alliance with Stalinist Atheism, he felt it had become a sweaty tug of war between two indistinguishable teams of louts. Only the chill bonds of law and duty and custom kept him to his obligations as an army Officer.
I wonder how Catholic historians in a hundred years time will analyse the role of the Second World War in the decline of what I believe some ghastly neocon once called old Europe: the Catholic and Orthodox Europe.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
Fr John Hunwicke
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
Archive
-
▼
2017
(317)
-
▼
August
(21)
- De vestitu praelatorum quaeritur
- World War II
- Is this intimidation fair? Is it Christian or Diab...
- Notice
- "IRREVERSIBLE"? UPDATED
- Amoris laetitia and Auschwitz
- KYRIA KAI DESPOZOUSA
- The Convert Problem
- Wiggery
- A Problem
- Apologies
- The Octave of the Assumption ...
- The English Catholic Hymn Book and Emily Clarke's ...
- Drip drip drip
- The Cult of the Blessed Sacrament (3)
- Ming the Merciless
- The Cult of the Blessed Sacrament (2)
- The Cult of the Blessed Sacrament (1)
- Trump and the Russkies
- Mueller
- Summorum Pontificum?
-
▼
August
(21)
Popular Posts
-
More Update: Perhaps I should have been more explicit about the complete wrongheadedness of the sort of speculations which could be triggere...
-
There are wild rumours on the Internet about News due to break tomorrow, Sunday. They are, as far as I know, all wrong. Far too wild. Far to...
-
To refresh your memories, I reprint a piece I wrote when an earlier electronic edition of the Dictator Pope was published under a pseudonym:...
-
So a correspondent wrote on one of my threads. It set me thinking. I am convinced that PF is most certainly not the worst man ever to hav...
-
Perhaps a couple of years ago, in Western Ireland, I had the privilege to be in the company of a very great prelate just after he had offere...
-
"After this Magisterium, after this long journey, we can affirm with certainty and with Magisterial authority that the Liturgical Refor...
-
Lead us not into temptation. It is unlikely that the Greek and Latin words translated by temptation meant the sort of thing we mean by '...
-
Pope Francis breaks his silence! A "In authorising regular use of the older Mass, now referred to as the 'extraordinary form'...
-
The heart of the Bergoglianist error is, in my fallible opinion, to be found in such texts as the letter Archbishop Nichols wrote last year ...
Followers
Links
Raffaello's Madonna di Foligno
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
5 comments:
The ghastly neocon in question was Donald Rumsfeld, who was contrasting the contemporary foreign policy stances taken by the countries who had recently escaped the yoke of communism (Poland, Hungary, Ukraine & company) with those of the historically dominant voices of continental Europe, France & Germany.
Knowing that, would you still maintain that the governments of modern France & Germany are "Catholic and Orthodox" in comparison to Poland, Hungary, Ukraine & company?
I hope it's not redundant to give more background for those who haven't read the book: Waugh (through his hero, Guy Crouchback) sees in the Sword of Stalingrad a symbol of the betrayal of the original 1939 anti-tyrannical cause against both Hitler and Stalin. That bejewelled, gold and silver-mounted sword (no expense spared there in an age of real austerity) was commissioned in 1943 at the command of King George VI and inscribed in Russian and English : 'TO THE STEEL-HEARTED CITIZENS OF STALINGRAD • THE GIFT OF KING GEORGE VI • IN TOKEN OF THE HOMAGE OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE'.
Not 'respect',or 'gratitude', or 'recognition', mark you, but 'the homage of the British people'.
Before being handed over personally by Churchill to Stalin at Yalta, the Sword was displayed around the UK. Crouchback witnesses the long queues of people outside Westminster Abbey "suffused with gratitude to their remote allies" and come "to worship it". Guy is repelled by their "piety", mentally contrasting that "atheistic" symbol with the sword that rests on the church tomb of his crusading ancestors.
Waugh's novel has many deft touches of social satire pointing out the upper-class stalinism that infested the civil service (plus ca change), the growing backstairs influence of the homintern (ditto), and the general bossiness and subtle, permanent debasement that happened in wartime Britain, and affected its society and foreign policy 'irreversibly' - a word we hear a lot just now..for some reason...:-)
(Waugh: Chap. I of 'Unconditional Surrender' - 'Sword of Honour' trilogy, Vol.III)
Pure coincidence no doubt, but Waugh was a pretty miserable academic.
I recall seeing a Newsreel, many years ago, in which W. Churchill, stated that he would ally with the Devil, if it would help him to defeat the Nazis. Well, it seems that he did.
The war effort became filled with evil actions; both deliberate and the turning of a blind eye to the evil of others. The fire bombing of whole cities, the "Take no prisoners" orders given by many commanders, and the many excesses in the Secret War.
I have long contended that America lost its soul in World War II, but I now see that it was Western Civilization that lost its soul and as a result is dying.
Probably with some criticism. But there are times when one fights the more urgent fight. Pity that FDR thought he could 'manage' Stalin, but as long as Hitler was both the immediately lethal threat AND grinding away at the Commies, it probably wasn't necessary to insist on fighting both at once.
And speaking from 27 years of naval service, it would have been very awkward operationally. I don't care for an amphibious landing near Murmansk to enable inland operations at all.
And anyone who proposed anything in the Baltic at that time should be sent to place of no influence.
Post a Comment