On the basis that "woke" is really a nonce noun/adjective presumably formed from the simple past tense, how about using a simple past tense of the verb "to arouse" but modifying it to look like a passive past participle?
I've just realised that, of course, I should have written "...the 2nd person plural of the perfect active indicative tense of the verb 'to arouse'..." .
Expergefactus?
ReplyDeleteconcitus vel φιλαίτιος?
ReplyDeleteψευδοφιλαιθίοψ
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteVigil
ReplyDeleteNonne homines huiusmodi etiam dicuntur milites iustitiae socialis? Vel fortasse dici potest excitati?
ReplyDeleteThe woke are barking, so they speak dog-Latin.
ReplyDeletevigilax seems to be good enough. It's a common epitheton of spiders eagerly waiting for the unaware to get ensnared in the net they've been weaving
ReplyDeleteIn-anum
ReplyDeleteSocors vel Intolerans
ReplyDeleteνόθοι
ReplyDeleteOn the basis that "woke" is really a nonce noun/adjective presumably formed from the simple past tense, how about using a simple past tense of the verb "to arouse" but modifying it to look like a passive past participle?
ReplyDeleteaccendimi
I've just realised that, of course, I should have written "...the 2nd person plural of the perfect active indicative tense of the verb 'to arouse'..." .
ReplyDeleteResurrectus -a -um? e.g. multi illi mortuorum qui suffragia sua ferre possunt.
ReplyDelete