Who canonised S Brendan? Or S Colman moccu Loigse? I can tell you: S Columba. Supernaturally enlightened, he ordered extra ordinem a celebration of the Most Holy Eucharist, and, in the case of S Colman, ordered the chanters during the actual celebration itself to include the newly-departed Holy One.
During the first Christian millennium, the custom arose of seeking Papal agency in canonisations; my impression is that this was mostly in order to enhance the solemnity of the procedings ... and hence, of the Saint ... and hence, of a sponsoring political entity.
But Canonisation by popular acclaim never quite disappeared. I have on several occasions drawn your attention to King Henry VI (obiit 1471), and the shrines and pilgrimages associated with this never-canonised Saint; and Michael Hodges's magnificent recent The Golden Legend brings together information and raises new questions.
In 'East Anglia', Hodges lists eight paintings of Henry VI; of those, two have readable inscriptions, and, in each case, the words are Rex Henricus Sextus. 'Sanctus' (or Scs) does not occur. Three of the paintings show Henry with a halo.
This suggests to me that artists and worshippers were well aware that the King did not have the formal status which would have secured the title Saint. But a halo, surely, does suggest sanctity.
This record also lists four examples of Sir John Schorne ('Sir' is the form by which the medievals addressed and referred to a priest who was not a graduate). A never-canonised parish priest of North Marston in Buckinghamshire, Schorne died in 1313.
Michael Hodges lists four representations of Sir John: I cannot see that any of them bears a text enabling us to discern whether he is addressed as sancte or described as sanctus. But three of them, I think, have haloes.
I'm not quite sure where these snippets of pointers leave us.
(I was uncertain whether to be irritated by the fact that Michael refers to Essex as part of East Anglia. As a determined Essex Man, I had always thought I might count as an East Saxon, rather than as an Angular. But since childhood, I concede, I have seen myself as a citizen of the Roman Colonia Claudia Victricensis Camulodensium, rather than of any terrible group of invading Teutons. So it must be OK.)
6 comments:
On the other hand, in Our Lady's (protestant) Church in Halle, Germany, we find a lovely medaillon with the peculiar inscription "Sanctus Doctor Martinus Luther Propheta Germaniae". Well, go figure...
(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marktkirche_Halle_(Saale)_41.jpg)
Dear Fr. Hunwicke.
Your comment of: (. . .'Sir' is the form by which the medievals addressed and referred to a priest who was not a graduate . . .) elicited a fond remembrance of a friend saying, at The Elevation during Mass: “Stay, Sir Priest, Stay”, thus encouraging the Priest to hold The Blessed Host aloft for a considerable time, rather than the Modern tendency of “up-and-down”.
I have since told my friend, who was educated by a wonderful Order of Nuns, that she must, therefore, be MediƦval.
I think that there were probably many attempts to create a cult for some "saint" that ultimately fell flat. In cases of acclimations, it sometimes just did not take, and was soon forgotten.
What about a case of Vatican canonizations? (The better view, I think, is that they are not infallible acts. They are merely liturgical permissions, and not solemn declarations regarding faith and morals. Thinking that declaring that Paul VI is in fact a saint is akin to saying that all of his own liturgical acts were infallibly correct choices as a matter of faith.)
I predict that most of the recent official canonizations will fail to attract a following. The system of canonization pre-supposed that some deceased person already had a cult of sorts that needed to be approved. Now, it becomes a top-down honours system.
Saints achieve lasting popularity for a limited number of reasons. Being a reliable patron who really delivers the goods for the clients, for example. St. Anne, Brother Andre, St. Anthony of Padua, St. Joseph all come instantly to mind. Or, they were great teachers, or brought the faith to their people, or suffered as martyrs.
If someone still has a cult a thousand years after their acclimation, that's a pretty good indication that they are really and truly saints. And just because the new ones are "official" will not ensure that they will last.
Paintings of Henry VI and John Schorne occur together on the screen in the Norfolk village church of Saint Helen, Gateley. Henry’s remains were translated from Chertsey Abbey to Windsor in 1484, whilst those of John Schorne were moved from Marston to Windsor in 1478.
Now the only dating evidence for these paintings at Gateley is the 1485 will of Richard Foxe, who left 6s. 8d. towards painting the screen (multiply by around 1500 for present day values). Obviously they were in the popular mind then.
Interesting. I have never seen before M. Luther referred a Sanctus, but there are parish churches named after him and Lutheran hymns mentioning him.
You can buy statues of St. Renata of Lorraine (and Bavaria), but she has never been canonized (yet).
Post a Comment