I see that Wikipedia attributes the drafting of the VI definition of Infallibilty to Cardinal Cullen of Dublin, whom it also describes as an Ultramontanist. The ultramontaism of Cullen and his friend George Errington, Archbishop of Trebizond (sometime coadjutor of Westminster) was certainly very different from the Neo-ultramontanism of Manning and Ward.
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
2 comments:
My guess is that this sounds like invincible ignorance? Literally.
Nah, it is just plain arrogant stupidity.
I see that Wikipedia attributes the drafting of the VI definition of Infallibilty to Cardinal Cullen of Dublin, whom it also describes as an Ultramontanist. The ultramontaism of Cullen and his friend George Errington, Archbishop of Trebizond (sometime coadjutor of Westminster) was certainly very different from the Neo-ultramontanism of Manning and Ward.
Post a Comment