... has had a busy life. It is not a 'show' biretta meant to go with a lace alb, but a working hat, out of shape and greying because of country churchyard burials during which, in the 42 years of my ministry, it has protected me from the elements.
It is a miraculous biretta. The pompom is gradually changing colour ... this is not a joke but sober fact ... from black to a reddish colour. I find this embarassing; I have never wanted to be a canon, and I don't think I would accept a canonry if offered. I wouldn't mind having a blue pompom like those Gricigliano chappies, but I don't know how to go about becoming their Anglican Annexe. But what am I to say when somebody asks me "Which Cathedral, Father, are you a canon of?"
I am minded to remove the pompom and go pompomless. But wouldn't that expose me to a charge of Aping the Oratory? Readers can help: am I right in thinking that the pompomless biretta is in fact the biretta of the clergy of the City of Rome itself? Is there any reason why the Anglican Clergy should be entitled to wear the garb of the Clerus Urbanus?
I think I've just thought of one. More tomorrow.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
Fr John Hunwicke
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
Archive
-
▼
2009
(332)
-
▼
April
(22)
- Baroque: Style in the Age of Magnificence (continu...
- Barockery
- Kalendare
- What is the really High Church way to wear a stole?
- Mental Reservation ...
- More Ministries
- Equivocation
- Good news: subdeacons
- Vicepresbyters
- MONOLITURGY
- Fr Arthur Middleton and my Biretta
- Immemorial Custom and the Third Rome and my biretta
- My biretta ...
- CORRIGENDA
- Chrismatic Communio
- ULTRAMONTANISM
- Hunwicke and the Holy Father
- What a shame it was in English
- PROCESSIONS
- The lesbuterai of Ebbsfleet
- More Lesbian Vampire Killers
- More Leo
-
▼
April
(22)
Popular Posts
-
More Update: Perhaps I should have been more explicit about the complete wrongheadedness of the sort of speculations which could be triggere...
-
There are wild rumours on the Internet about News due to break tomorrow, Sunday. They are, as far as I know, all wrong. Far too wild. Far to...
-
To refresh your memories, I reprint a piece I wrote when an earlier electronic edition of the Dictator Pope was published under a pseudonym:...
-
So a correspondent wrote on one of my threads. It set me thinking. I am convinced that PF is most certainly not the worst man ever to hav...
-
Perhaps a couple of years ago, in Western Ireland, I had the privilege to be in the company of a very great prelate just after he had offere...
-
"After this Magisterium, after this long journey, we can affirm with certainty and with Magisterial authority that the Liturgical Refor...
-
Lead us not into temptation. It is unlikely that the Greek and Latin words translated by temptation meant the sort of thing we mean by '...
-
Pope Francis breaks his silence! A "In authorising regular use of the older Mass, now referred to as the 'extraordinary form'...
-
The heart of the Bergoglianist error is, in my fallible opinion, to be found in such texts as the letter Archbishop Nichols wrote last year ...
Followers
Links
Raffaello's Madonna di Foligno
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
8 comments:
I know of one clergyman who removed his pompom because he didn't like it. When he was made a canon, the pompom returned...
Perhaps it would help if we could see exactly how much color change is involved.
Of course, you could opt for a Canterbury cap...
Dear Father, I have never understood the Anglo-Catholic attachment to the shabby: why not simply buy yourself a new biretta, and keep the old one for sentiment's sake?
....or buy a new one from Poland (cheap, all weathers, can be boiled) and install the old one on a statue of the Saint Cure d'Ars, where it will ever remind you of the saint's holy poverty.
Since when have birettas been mentioned in the Ornaments Rubric?
Much better to wear a proper clerical cap.
Why would you need (or want) to boil a biretta? Do they need to be periodically sterilized or something?
I, personally, prefer pom-pom-less birettas. I would recommend, however, that you keep your pom-pom. This is because most Anglo-Catholics tend to ape the French style of vestment. The pom-pom is very French. Not to have one is very Italian. I assume that your vestments are mainly in the French style so for consistency a pom-pom would be better.
An interesting side note you might like is that pom-poms were banned for all none priestly clergy by Paul VI; that is to say, seminarians may not wear pom-pommed birettas. It has become customary, however, for the 1917 Code of Canon Law to be followed exclusively when one celebrates the Old Rite. Thus if you see a modern Roman seminarian with a pom-pommed biretta you can be sure that he is an Old Rite attender. :-)
Go one, Father, let's see a photograph of you wearing the venerable relic!
Post a Comment