I wonder if I'm the only one who , when he hears talk of the Lottery (although I've never actually had a go at it) fantasises about what he would do if got the twelve million. This week, I have no doubts. I would pay for a lavish advertising campaign on the sides of buses, with this message:
THERE'S PROBABLY NO DAWKINS
SO STOP WORRYING AND ENJOY YOUR GOD
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
Fr John Hunwicke
was for nearly three decades at Lancing College; where he taught Latin and Greek language and literature, was Head of Theology, and Assistant Chaplain. He has served three curacies, been a Parish Priest, and Senior Research Fellow at Pusey House in Oxford. Since 2011, he has been in full communion with the See of S Peter. The opinions expressed on this Blog are not asserted as being those of the Magisterium of the Church, but as the writer's opinions as a private individual. Nevertheless, the writer strives, hopes, and prays that the views he expresses are conformable with and supportive of the Magisterium. In this blog, the letters PF stand for Pope Francis. On this blog, 'Argumentum ad hominem' refers solely to the Lockean definition, Pressing a man with the consequences of his own concessions'.
Archive
Popular Posts
-
More Update: Perhaps I should have been more explicit about the complete wrongheadedness of the sort of speculations which could be triggere...
-
There are wild rumours on the Internet about News due to break tomorrow, Sunday. They are, as far as I know, all wrong. Far too wild. Far to...
-
To refresh your memories, I reprint a piece I wrote when an earlier electronic edition of the Dictator Pope was published under a pseudonym:...
-
So a correspondent wrote on one of my threads. It set me thinking. I am convinced that PF is most certainly not the worst man ever to hav...
-
Perhaps a couple of years ago, in Western Ireland, I had the privilege to be in the company of a very great prelate just after he had offere...
-
"After this Magisterium, after this long journey, we can affirm with certainty and with Magisterial authority that the Liturgical Refor...
-
Lead us not into temptation. It is unlikely that the Greek and Latin words translated by temptation meant the sort of thing we mean by ...
-
Pope Francis breaks his silence! A "In authorising regular use of the older Mass, now referred to as the 'extraordinary form...
-
The heart of the Bergoglianist error is, in my fallible opinion, to be found in such texts as the letter Archbishop Nichols wrote last year ...
Followers
Links
Raffaello's Madonna di Foligno
... once graced the high altar of the church of Sancta Maria in Ara Coeli on the Capitoline Hill.
1 comment:
Dear Fr.,
This is wh'at I put in my November 'News-sheet:
"I wonder if, had I enough money, I would put it towards advertisements on Buses: you know that Professor Richard Dawkins (‘The God Delusion’) has had a great fanfare made of the fact that he is helping the Secularist Society – or The Rationalist Society: some such body – in a campaign to ‘counter’ Christian advertising on the sides of buses, with the, for an avowed and militant Atheist, rather coyly modulated statement, ‘God probably doesn’t exist’. Does he, I ask myself, use the same Advertising Agency that a Lager manufacturer did, prominently featuring the word ‘probably’? And, if he really is and they are – Atheist, why the very qualified claim ‘probably’? Isn’t that what mere Agnostics say, or think? Is he, after all, not a ‘strong Atheist’, but a ‘weak Atheist’?
Now I have met and known many ‘weak Atheists’ – those who cannot subscribe to belief in God, or a God; and I constantly meet ‘Practical Atheists’ – those who live as if there were no God, or Gods, who are indifferent to the whole idea: get up, go to work, come home, watch telly, get up, go to work, come home go to the pub, get up, go to work, come home, watch telly - kiddy’s ill, go to Doctor, get prescription, get up, go to work, come home...
Let's start a campaign that proclaims 'Dawkins does not exist... and it is not necessary to invent him.'
As an afterthought, would Professor Dawkins dare to subscribe to buses that said, "Allah does not exist, and M******d is not His Prophet?
I expect the Plod to knock at my door, any momemt now!
Post a Comment