tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post7512399724286172407..comments2024-03-27T17:29:51.954+00:00Comments on Fr Hunwicke's Mutual Enrichment: SARUM ... 1549Fr John Hunwickehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17766211573399409633noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-84220696447964082312010-03-17T06:06:31.498+00:002010-03-17T06:06:31.498+00:00Also, the Scottish Liturgy is, well, unknown to al...Also, the Scottish Liturgy is, well, unknown to all but liturgically-obsessed persons (mea culpa) outside the very small numbers who use it. That's not to say I don't hope to see it used in a Scottish Ordinariate, but it would be to most other Anglicans quite outside their experience.Joshuahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17387698013828199070noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-76271736331964665162010-03-17T06:04:35.480+00:002010-03-17T06:04:35.480+00:00Certainly the Scottish (1929 plus 1764, still supe...Certainly the Scottish (1929 plus 1764, still superior in some respects) is the best. However, it is said that the long Canon (Prayer of Consecration, Prayer of Oblation and Prayer for the Church) proves soporific...Joshuahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17387698013828199070noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-73777518905264662612010-03-16T15:58:47.123+00:002010-03-16T15:58:47.123+00:00Would there be any objection to the use of the Sco...Would there be any objection to the use of the Scotch BCP Holy Communion? That always seemed to me the best of the BCP family, and it is (here and there) still in use.<br /><br />The Cowley missal is never mentioned, but it has some elegant translations.Little Black Sambohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16699227938165106710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-51726786106548843992010-03-15T23:18:53.823+00:002010-03-15T23:18:53.823+00:00I hope Dr Tighe could post something on the Roman ...I hope Dr Tighe could post something on the Roman Canon in the Anglo-Catholic.Juliohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06893150601023369479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-8966368641052759222010-03-15T20:47:28.970+00:002010-03-15T20:47:28.970+00:00In the Canadian parish to which I belong we celebr...In the Canadian parish to which I belong we celebrated the liturgy of Candlemas according to the Sarum Rite, (similar to what Pastor in Valle did) just this year. It is a splendid Rite with truly beautiful formulae. It would need updating which is certainly problematic but it seems appropriate to make the effort when healing the schism by which this treasure was suppressed.<br /><br />The only Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07352598115559204014noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-90174446252925770162010-03-15T20:33:08.652+00:002010-03-15T20:33:08.652+00:00Fr H., you've raised the crux of the issue bef...Fr H., you've raised the crux of the issue before: Cranmer's Canon (not that he'd have liked it called that). Looking at the old BDW, it basically took over the 1979 US BCP's Eucharistic liturgy, modified a few bits here and there, and (in)famously made three main changes: it insisted on the modern Roman lectionary (boo!) and "Preparation of the Gifts" (hmmm), and Joshuahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17387698013828199070noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-81277197491561557762010-03-15T19:16:34.625+00:002010-03-15T19:16:34.625+00:00Having initially swallowed the argument for liturg...Having initially swallowed the argument for liturgical renewal because it seemed to rest on such solid scholarly and ecumenical ground, I am now very much in your camp, Father, in wishing to avoid any untimely births or exhumations. I wonder how 1662 is going to fare in all this. Dix's analysis of 1549 and 1552 has been a source of no small anxiety for me in that department. I have been Jessehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00104652633000677197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-71263894973175574212010-03-15T18:56:47.246+00:002010-03-15T18:56:47.246+00:00This comment has been removed by the author.Jessehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00104652633000677197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-26577082928475057562010-03-15T16:09:38.421+00:002010-03-15T16:09:38.421+00:00Do keep up, mon Pére. I've actually been sayin...Do keep up, mon Pére. I've actually been saying something similar myself.<br /><br />http://www.theanglocatholic.com/2010/03/patrimony-again-sorry/Pastor in Montehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05949810648656544072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-54882765691461762662010-03-15T13:38:37.423+00:002010-03-15T13:38:37.423+00:00"Great minds think alike" -- or, as I wr..."Great minds think alike" -- or, as I wrote recently here:<br /><br />http://www.theanglocatholic.com/2010/03/thoughts-on-an-anglican-use-mass/<br /><br />'As to the 1549 rite’s EP I have never been able to understand its attraction for some Anglo-Catholics. I accept the reading of Cranmer’s theology underlying that prayer as fundamentally Reformed (in the Swiss sense) that has William Tighehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16634494183165592707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-12074166279798618682010-03-15T12:45:17.192+00:002010-03-15T12:45:17.192+00:00Dix lays great weight on the importance of CUSTOM ...Dix lays great weight on the importance of CUSTOM and the CONTINUATION OF PRACTICE in the whole business of deciding what constitutes "traditional" Liturgy.<br /><br />Let's not make the make the mistake, please, of dragging up things out of historical documents (e.g. 1549) without referring FIRST to those things which have ALWAYS BEEN AND REMAIN TO THIS DAY in continuous use! Michael Vysehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16294362453411505284noreply@blogger.com