tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post7626247102702332464..comments2024-03-27T17:29:51.954+00:00Comments on Fr Hunwicke's Mutual Enrichment: Apostolicae curae and Benedict XIVFr John Hunwickehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17766211573399409633noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-80022238490604604792010-08-04T21:57:49.025+01:002010-08-04T21:57:49.025+01:00I agree wholeheartedly with your conclusion and ap...I agree wholeheartedly with your conclusion and appreciate the points you have brought up.<br /><br />Yet I wonder - you seem to be claiming in this post that unconditional reordination was the rule whenever porrection had been omitted even up until the 20th century, two centuries after Benedict XIV.<br /><br />But AC itself states that in the time the bull was written (and evidently for quite Gideon Ertnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06572157722582694936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-57373464004802096272010-08-04T18:06:58.642+01:002010-08-04T18:06:58.642+01:00An interesting series, Father.
Would you mind if ...An interesting series, Father.<br /><br />Would you mind if I asked you a question regarding the context? Your post seems to suggest that Vaughan was the driving force behind the document. My understanding was that it was largely a response to Anglo-Catholics seeking a clarification of the situation. I'm sure it's dealt with in Michael Yelton's book 'Anglican Papalism.' Riccardo Cipollahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11465001089726995835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-87820108584144500952010-08-04T10:38:51.354+01:002010-08-04T10:38:51.354+01:00Regarding what you said in the last lines above ab...Regarding what you said in the last lines above about "the cheerful Anglican irresponsibility which introduces doubt into the Sacraments of our Redemption in accordance with the transient fancy or whimsy of a particular period; whether of the mid-sixteenth century or the late twentieth":<br /><br />Fools rush in and all that but - what think you, Fr H., of my argument (cross-posted on Joshuahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17387698013828199070noreply@blogger.com