tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post740767776549033640..comments2024-03-28T14:19:53.973+00:00Comments on Fr Hunwicke's Mutual Enrichment: Fifty Years Since The Council Was CalledFr John Hunwickehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17766211573399409633noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-76380148750864540662009-01-28T23:20:00.000+00:002009-01-28T23:20:00.000+00:00Tradition develops and the documents of the Counci...Tradition develops and the documents of the Council are part of the Tradition.Did Joseph Ratzinger probably agreed with Newman that Vatican I was unnecessary and unhelpful, as promoted by Ultramontanists who "caused the heart of the faithful to mourn". Personally I find, after contact with some so-called traditionalists, that the Vatican II documents on ecumenism, religious liberty, and other Independenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08199774656279385253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-28096677015433011132009-01-26T15:56:00.000+00:002009-01-26T15:56:00.000+00:00Perhaps it's because Voltaire was a "rebel without...Perhaps it's because Voltaire was a "rebel without a cause," whereas the bully-boys are "rebels with a cause? If so, their cause is to impose indifference in the hearts of men; and in particular Christian men.<BR/><BR/>The only thing that produces a stern condemnation from the "Church" is failure to conform to the Hermeneutic of Indifference. You're more likely to suffer at the hands of "Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com