tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post7218071376205509781..comments2024-03-27T17:29:51.954+00:00Comments on Fr Hunwicke's Mutual Enrichment: Sedevacantism ... Fr John Hunwickehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17766211573399409633noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-11173789181714643752016-01-24T22:06:50.200+00:002016-01-24T22:06:50.200+00:00Fr. J,
Indeed, Honorius, who VI, at my first impr...Fr. J,<br /><br />Indeed, Honorius, who VI, at my first impression, glossed over with a rather biased narrative in order to clear the way to the dogmatic declaration on papal infalibility.<br /><br />I see no search engine in your blog. I do see a chronological archive, but not even a list of the most frequent tags. I'll google your site for such articles you mentioned.<br /><br />Thank youAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-37746885492696751752016-01-24T21:31:42.059+00:002016-01-24T21:31:42.059+00:00Hello, Augustine!
What you say sounds right to me...Hello, Augustine!<br /><br />What you say sounds right to me. The most obviously heretical pope was Honorius, who wascondemned and anathematised by an Ecumenical Council and a whole list of his own successors on the Chair of S Peter.<br /><br />Have you seen the little search engine on my blog, top left hand corner? I have written quite a number of pieces on papal authority; Ratzinger's Fr John Hunwickehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17766211573399409633noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-61564269518753850812016-01-24T20:57:36.215+00:002016-01-24T20:57:36.215+00:00I'm new to this blog, but I'm curious abou...I'm new to this blog, but I'm curious about your statement that popes have been heretics before. I argued before that John XXII was one such, but others argued that he really, de juris, wasn't, because only his successor made dogmatic the belief that the holy souls do enjoy the beatific vision. Still, he held a de facto heretical belief. Reflecting on this, it seems to me that the Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-52159438547161078812016-01-21T21:27:20.971+00:002016-01-21T21:27:20.971+00:00It is surprising that people can be much more easi...It is surprising that people can be much more easily convinced that someone is not a Catholic, i.e. is a heretic, than they can be that the very same person is not a pope, as if being a Catholic were not a requirement for being a pope! The rhetorical question 'Is the Pope Catholic?' is a popular way of expressing that necessary connection which antedates current controversies. Talk of Opacushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11669937390170566846noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-82872802910854313752016-01-20T20:39:03.394+00:002016-01-20T20:39:03.394+00:00Dear Gillineau. Was it Chartreuse for breakfast th...Dear Gillineau. Was it Chartreuse for breakfast that was the proximate cause of your thoughts or are you possessed of a wicked wit most of us can not even hope to achieve? :)<br /><br /><br />In any event, a Old Popes Home is one captious idea that eluded Monty Python.Mick Jagger Gathers No Mosquehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12879499915093940176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-5751990896239883522016-01-20T20:37:21.288+00:002016-01-20T20:37:21.288+00:00I find myself struggling with sedevacantism. Not o...I find myself struggling with sedevacantism. Not on my own part, but as a concept. It is very difficult for me to get my ahead around a situation where one might not only believe the Holy Father to be no longer a legitimate pope but also that one is qualified to make such a judgement.<br /><br />I say this as equally for sedevacantism as for its little brother, sedeprivationism. Pétrushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07278005406146945637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-4466729448034687582016-01-20T13:49:32.715+00:002016-01-20T13:49:32.715+00:00With respect to a conclave, did not Archbishop Lef...With respect to a conclave, did not Archbishop Lefebvre remind us that the post-conclave acclaim by the Roman clergy and people constitutes a ratification of the announced result so it cannot thereafter be challenged?Woodyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08910654300435533408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-72874939397669823652016-01-20T04:03:22.077+00:002016-01-20T04:03:22.077+00:00Well said, Father. Never having been to a conclave...Well said, Father. Never having been to a conclave myself, I have always had to accept some church historian's word confirming the occupant of the See of Peter or on what colour of smoke was emitted from the chimney of deliberation results.<br /><br />I sometimes feel that the sedevacantistas let too much smoke get into their eyes. <br /><br />Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Liam Ronanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01376666519733160167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-44056813952188459022016-01-19T23:13:02.946+00:002016-01-19T23:13:02.946+00:00I thought co-pope was quite good, quite funny. Wit...I thought co-pope was quite good, quite funny. With continued advances in modern medicine granting ever greater longevity we could have co-co-popes, which would be delicious. Maybe they could each be made to wear slightly paler hues (of creamy white) to denote their order of retirement.Gillineauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17789163020221679786noreply@blogger.com