tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post1613511229409056822..comments2024-03-29T09:39:50.604+00:00Comments on Fr Hunwicke's Mutual Enrichment: Ordo Ordo Ordo OrdoFr John Hunwickehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17766211573399409633noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-37284745905500694762009-11-10T15:12:17.174+00:002009-11-10T15:12:17.174+00:00Thank you, David, for the correction; it was Trent...Thank you, David, for the correction; it was Trent. I'm not sure why I had it wrong in my memory? I recall it had to do with once seeing the offending text in a pre-Leo post-Pius missal - I can't recall? Interestingly, this Sequence is set for Friday in Easter Week in the Sarum use, and different Sequences are used the other days of the octave.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-29953922076120657362009-11-10T08:16:12.581+00:002009-11-10T08:16:12.581+00:00David Foster,
You are quite correct. I should ha...David Foster,<br /><br />You are quite correct. I should have written "Fr. Black...carried on using the 'pre-Pius XII' rubrics for most of the year." He did indeed do a 'pic N mix' for Holy Week and celebrated Joe the Worker Day rather than SS Philip and James on May 1st.<br /><br />I went to an old friend's funeral yesterday at the SSPX church in London. That Rubricariushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05050302650867319277noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-87283793107971385202009-11-09T22:45:58.398+00:002009-11-09T22:45:58.398+00:001. Was it really Leo XIII who removed that verse f...1. Was it really Leo XIII who removed that verse from the Victimae Paschali? I thought it was Pope St Pius V in 1570. I'd be interested to know for sure on this point.<br /><br />2. Like Rubricarius, I'd be interested to know precisely why Mgr Lefebvre plumped for 1962 rather than 1965. Perhaps it was simply the fact that most traddy priests were using it, or something older. SSPX priestsdavidforsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15603145004197815827noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-46006983672611649492009-11-08T13:38:02.807+00:002009-11-08T13:38:02.807+00:00Conchur
By that logic did Mgr. Lefebvre believe P...Conchur<br /><br />By that logic did Mgr. Lefebvre believe Paul VI was not a pope?<br /><br />Mgr. Lefebvre actually started off following some of Paul VI's changes and used some variant of the 1965-67 rite when Econe was first founded. It was only later that he adopted 1962. I would welcome any concrete evidence that he favoured anything older - even getting him to say the last Gospel wasRubricariushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05050302650867319277noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-31220976231621353952009-11-08T12:29:18.019+00:002009-11-08T12:29:18.019+00:00As far as I recall, Mgr Lefebrve plumped for the 1...As far as I recall, Mgr Lefebrve plumped for the 1962 Missal specifically to root out the sedevacantists in the SSPX who used the pre '62 books to illustrate the fact that they did not accept John XXIII as a true pope.<br /><br />Again as far as I recall Lefebrve's personal preference was for the pre '55 Missal.Conchúrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06616869558976756046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8940364093450837549.post-49739810573087441952009-11-08T10:50:07.623+00:002009-11-08T10:50:07.623+00:00"That was something Mgr Lefebvre got wrong.&q..."That was something Mgr Lefebvre got wrong."<br /><br />He and a host of others.<br /><br />I am reminded of this dis-junction every time I talk with friends that use the '62 (I use 1950 or 1940/1). Though I think the rot began with Leo XIII's truncation of the Easter Sequence. He removed:<br /><br />Credendum est magis soli Mariae veraci Quam Judaeorum turbae fallaci.<br /><br Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com