8 November 2014

Remembrance Sunday

The Requiem Mass for the War dead prays for men and women who, like all of us, stand in need of merciful forgiveness. We plead the sacrifice of Christ, offering His Body and Blood, for them, not as heroes but as sinners. On the other hand, the customary rituals of Cenotaph observance have - surely, even now - a nationalism built into them, while the Mass subverts every nationalism. It was, after all, offered on both sides in the European wars. The great Fr Bernard Walke, who made St Hilary in Cornwall into an Anglo-Catholic village, instituted the service of Benediction during WW1 "as an act of reparation to the Sacred Heart for the wrongs of war, and as a means of uniting ourselves with our enemies in that Sacrament which knows no frontiers". Walke, a papalist, wholeheartedly supported the attitude of Benedict XV to the War and was beaten up in the street for refusing to accept the rhetoric of war-time hysteria. (I wonder if it was a conscious echo of his words about reparation to the Sacred Heart which led the congregation at my old church of S Thomas's to put up a German-carved statue of the Sacred Heart as their War Memorial, beside tablets with the names of the departed inscribed upon them.)

As far as WW2 is concerned, I often think about the contrast between two great fictional products of that war, both written by combatants; both overtly semi-autobiographical. Monsarrat's The Cruel Sea is written by an ideologically and morally rudderless lapsed Marxist; as a memorial to the men who fought the war of the Atlantic convoys. I find it full of venom; venom against adulterous wives back home; against tall blond German submarine captains; against bullying Australians; against the Irish who denied Cork Harbour and Bantry Bay to the Royal Navy. Evelyn Waugh's Sword of Honour trilogy is quite different. At its beginning, Waugh, a traditionalist Catholic burdened with ethical Rights and Wrongs, saw the conflict as a chivalrous crusade on behalf of Christian civilisation against Nazi barbarism and its atheist allies in Moskow. When the war was ending, with Uncle Jo a genial ally and sitting on half of Europe, Waugh had come to perceive it as a sweaty tug of war between two teams of scarcely distinguishable louts. Waugh discerns the ironies and hypocrisies as embodied in the Sword of Stalingrad - a gift from the Christian King of England; a symbol of chivalry to congratulate Marshal Stalin; a triumph of craftsmanship ... and with the symbols on its scabbard upside down. Waugh's hero sees, as Waugh himself had seen, the post-War savaging of Christian Europe in Tito's Jugoslavia.

The Mass is just as subversive of our modern tyrannies as it was of the horrible nationalisms of the twentieth century. It subverts now-fashionable assumptions of roles and genders. As a communal and hierarchical act with a formal and inherited structure, it subverts the cultures of choice, of spontaneity, of individual autonomy, of each man constructing her own identity, everybody manufacturing their own god. As a ritual which looks beyond itself, it subverts the assumptions of human self-sufficiency. And it speaks of Judgement; Judgement passed by a Court of No Appeal far beyond any Court of Human Rights.

Indeed, the rights which the Mass enthrones are the rights of a Creator and the vested interests of a Redeemer.

6 comments:

Woody said...

Thank you for this great messgawe, Father. For a nonfiction account of WWII, I would highly recommend Norman Davies' "No Simple Victory".

Rubricarius said...

Can anyone, either our learned blog host, or distinguished commenters, kindly enlighten me as to the praxis in England of having an Anniversay Requiem Mass on Remembrance Sunday?

People refer to an indult of Benedict XV. I have scanned the indices of the AAS (I have not as yet plodded through the body text itself) but cannot find what I am looking for. What I did not was that Benedict XV granted permission on October 6th 1919 for one Requiem when November 2nd fell on a Sunday in 1919 (AAS 11, pp. 420-421) which specified tantum hoc anno.

Any help appreciated.

Fr John S. Toon said...

Brilliant!
Fr John S. Toon

Reader said...

"The Mass subverts every nationalism." This post is a splendid reminder of the true source of state-driven anti-clericalism, tending either to suppression of religion or aspiring to total control. The true faith has always been the unconquerable rival of statesmen.

G said...

The ordo of the Latin Mass Society has this:

'In all DIOCESES of ENGLAND & WALES:
ad lib MASS for REMEMBRANCE SUNDAY

'Today one Requiem Mass may be celebrated for those who died in the two World Wars. This should be Mass on the Anniversary.

'Black vestments. No Gl Sequence No Cr Pr of the Dead Requiescant in Pace. No Blessing. Collect, Secret & Postcommunion as given in plural form. If the Absolutions follow the Last Gospel is omitted.'

I too would be curious for the citation.

Rose Marie said...

Father, thank you for the last two paragraphs, especially. I know you are not speaking specifically of the Usus Antiquior, but it most especially fulfills this role, so sorely needed to resist oppression and nurture our freedom to worship and live as we ought.